Page Summary
fiorenza-a.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiorenza-a.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiorenza-a.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiorenza-a.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
merentha13.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
freetraveller15.livejournal.com - (no subject)
freetraveller15.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shooting2kill.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sw33n3y.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sw33n3y.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ali15son.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fiorenza-a.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Patsy by
- Theme: Clay Deco by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
I really like this one - I like the way Doyle's t-shirt picks up the green in the foliage and Bodie's jacket resonates with the colour of the bricks.
Doyle looks a little bit shorn in this one and Bodie a little more shaggy.
It'd make a great jigsaw puzzle...hint, hint...just saying...if anyone was listening...looks around whistling innocently...
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 12:20 pm (UTC)(I've suddenly got worried about copyright infringement because my images keep being deleted! Does that happen to any of your images? I wondered if it was the image hosting site I was using.)
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 01:58 pm (UTC)I don't post much off Lj, but take downs are usually followed by a notice warning of the infraction - have you trawled the site's small print (to coin a phrase)?
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
I doubt it's copyright too (although you can't, absolutely, rule it out) -
but, no they wouldn't - not as things currently stand. There's a lot of litigation and manoeuvring around this as we speak, but basically under most relevant jurisdictions, ultimately, it's the poster's responsibility to deal with copyright - not the hosting website's - so yours not tumblr's.
So, in order to get their stuff taken down, the copyright holder approaches the website and protests - the website then removes the offending work (and usually warns the poster). That's a huge oversimplification - but basically true - as things stand currently.
The copyright holders are pressing for this to change - hosting websites, not so keen.
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Yeah, that's what I'm hoping - and, to be fair, as you say, probably is :0)
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:05 pm (UTC)Thanks for writing! There is no expiration period for posts, however posts can be deleted if we receive a valid reason for removal, such as a DMCA takedown notice claiming copyright infringement or a terms of service violation.
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 07:28 pm (UTC)My images are usually about 375 x 325 which includes the borders.
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 08:54 pm (UTC)I may be wrong but I think in order to post images on your LJ entries, you can only do it in two ways: either uploading the pic directly to your LJ account (under the Scrapbook section; if you can't find it, just use this link http://yourjournalname.livejournal.com/photo - replace "yourjournalname" with your LJ account name, so in my case it would be http://freetraveller15.livejournal.com/photo/) and then copy the image's URL into your journal entry (you can archive your images on your LJ Scrapbook into folders, in the same way as it can be done on Photobucket, Flickr or similar).
Or you upload your images to an external image hosting platform (Photobucket, Tinypic, Flickr etc) and copy the image URL into LJ. But you have to upload your image onto an account controlled by you, your own Photobucket or whatever account. You cannot "hotlink" your LJ entries to images posted on the web, anywhere, including other people's Photobucket etc accounts. Hotlinking is usually forbidden in online forums or social networks like LJ (I don't know about tumblr, though).
So basically any image you'd like to post has to be saved/uploaded first onto a platform that 'belongs' to you, whether your own LJ account or Photobucket or similar sites where you have created your own account.
So what I'm trying to say is that for example if you see an image that another Photobucket user has on their account (as a public photo, because if it was set to private you wouldn't be able to see it), you cannot hotlink it to your LJ entry directly, but you have to save it first on your computer and then upload it yourself to your own platform(s), as I said either your Photobucket/Flickr etc account, or your own LJ account under Scrapbook.
If you hotlink, even if it might be allowed, you have no control over what happens to the original image. If the account holder of the image hosting account from where you've linked the image decides to delete it from his/her account, it won't be shown anymore in your posts where you've hotlinked it.
Otherwise, it may be your own account but the image has been deleted without you knowing, by the image histing site because of copyright infringement: but I thought in that case the image hosting site would alert you that they had removed one of your images...? It's never happened to me, so I don't know for sure.
P :)
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 08:58 pm (UTC)Thank you x
no subject
Date: 2016-07-23 09:37 pm (UTC)Please don't be sorry! (and apologies to ali15son for monopolising her journal). I was hoping you might contribute but didn't like to push my luck as you've already been so helpful and given up a lot of your valuable time. Another kind fan has also suggested I use Scrapbook so it really sounds as though you're both on the right track with my problem.
I've got to go offline now but I shall read what you say again tomorrow morning when, hopefully, it will all sink into place! The way you explain things helps me to imagine or picture the whole process which I seem to need to do in order to understand things better.
Thank you so much. You and others here are all stars and have given me more hope about the journal which, with all the niggles and various problems over the past couple of years I've been getting more and more fed up with. e .g. every time I replace the images I return another day to find more images are gone...it's enough to make someone paranoid!
no subject
Date: 2016-07-24 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-24 05:21 am (UTC)I tend to think along Ali15son's lines, that if it were due to image copyright, alone, sites like tumblr wouldn't be around. My guess is that the DMCA small print is to cover them for certain unusually contentious situations where a formal complaint has been made. I'm separating this still image issue from the vidding one (using music and footage) which definitely does attract a lot of automated DMCA attention and action.
Most of the time I post images that I've uploaded from my computer image files, to my LJ scrapbook. From there, they can be added to your LJ or AO3 post. I think the only time the older entries have not displayed the image, was after LJ changed its privacy setting method.
I can understand how frustrating this ongoing technical issue would be. I really hope you find a workable solution. I'd hate to think we'd lose your Visions posts.
no subject
Date: 2016-07-24 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-07-24 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
It depends on the fandom - some American holders actively encourage fanworks some are dead set against them.
The music rights holders tend to be the snippiest.
My own pictures I manage pretty much as Freetraveller15 says. I don't have a hosting account (well I have an accidental Pixiv.net account so I could pick up Minori's work, but that doesn't really count).
As I'm sure you're aware, your scrapbook is on the dropdown menu which appears when you hover over your user name on your Lj account banner. I'm not sure if you've used it, but it offers a resize option when you add the pic to a post - and the option to link to a full size pic - I must admit I quite often forget that bit and have to re-edit my post.
I used it for the butterflies post you were kind enough to comment on (http://fiorenza-a.livejournal.com/33410.html) - so if you click on the picture it brings up a larger version.
You can also use the HTML view when you post to edit the size, although I tend not to do that within Lj since it gets very cranky with me.
(Currently Lj is reposting my cuts - so it shows them in place when I insert them - then when I press 'post' it either moves them or removes altogether - meaning it can take several attempts to post anything. It didn't use to do it, but every time they fiddle with it I seem to swap one set of irritations for another!)